Read the latest backup news:
January 19, 2010
Novosoft Signs Distribution Agreement with Nexway, Bringing the Leading Backup Solution to the Western Europe Region
December 22, 2009
Novosoft Provides 20% Discounts and Holidays Gifts on Handy Backup
Mirror backup: how real-time data mirroring works and when to use it
Learn what mirror backup is, how real-time data mirroring works, and where it fits in your backup strategy. We cover benefits, risks, common use cases, and best practices for combining mirrors with other backup methods to protect your data.
What is a mirror backup?
A mirror backup creates an exact, up-to-date copy of your data on another storage device. When a file is added, changed or deleted on the source, the same action happens on the mirror. This makes the mirrored storage look almost identical to the original system at any moment. You can treat it as a live "shadow" of your production data.
Unlike traditional scheduled backups, mirroring usually runs continuously. Changes are propagated automatically with minimal delay. Because of that, a mirror is often used as a high-availability tool, not just for recovery. If the main system fails, you can quickly switch users to the mirrored copy.
Unlike traditional scheduled backups, mirroring usually runs continuously. Changes are propagated automatically with minimal delay. Because of that, a mirror is often used as a high-availability tool, not just for recovery. If the main system fails, you can quickly switch users to the mirrored copy.
How mirror backup works in practice
In a typical setup, you have a primary storage volume and a secondary one. Mirroring software or hardware monitors write operations on the primary side. Whenever data is written, updated or removed, the same operation is sent to the mirror. This process can be synchronous or asynchronous.
With synchronous mirroring, the write is confirmed only when both sides are updated. This keeps the two copies almost perfectly in sync, but may add latency. Asynchronous mirroring confirms writes on the primary first, then pushes updates to the secondary system shortly after.
With synchronous mirroring, the write is confirmed only when both sides are updated. This keeps the two copies almost perfectly in sync, but may add latency. Asynchronous mirroring confirms writes on the primary first, then pushes updates to the secondary system shortly after.
Benefits of real-time data mirroring
The main advantage of a mirrored backup is rapid recovery. If your primary storage fails, you already have a ready-to-use copy. Failover can be almost immediate, minimizing downtime. For many businesses, this is critical for customer-facing services.
Another benefit is simplicity for end users. In many designs, switching to the mirror is transparent to applications. No manual restore process is needed before work can continue. This makes mirroring a strong tool for continuity rather than just restoration.
Another benefit is simplicity for end users. In many designs, switching to the mirror is transparent to applications. No manual restore process is needed before work can continue. This makes mirroring a strong tool for continuity rather than just restoration.
Key limitations and risks
The biggest risk of mirroring is that it also replicates mistakes. If someone deletes an important file, the deletion is mirrored too. If ransomware encrypts your data, the mirror is likely to be encrypted as well. You gain availability, but not historical recovery by default.
Mirrored setups can also be more expensive than basic backups. They require a second storage system with comparable capacity and performance. Synchronous mirroring may add latency to write operations. All of this must be considered when planning your infrastructure.
Mirrored setups can also be more expensive than basic backups. They require a second storage system with comparable capacity and performance. Synchronous mirroring may add latency to write operations. All of this must be considered when planning your infrastructure.
A mirror is not a full replacement for scheduled backups. Traditional full, incremental or differential backups store past versions of data. They let you restore to a point in time before corruption or deletion occurred. A mirror, on its own, only gives you the most recent state.
In other words, mirroring focuses on availability, while classic backup methods focus on historical recovery. The strongest strategies usually combine both approaches. You get fast failover plus the ability to roll back to older, clean copies.
Mirror backup vs traditional backup methods
Mirroring is common for critical applications that cannot afford long downtime. Examples include online transaction systems, customer portals and key databases. If the primary storage fails, the mirrored copy can take over quickly. This keeps services running while you investigate the root cause.
It is also used for hardware maintenance and upgrades. Admins can move workloads to the secondary system, work on the primary, then resync and switch back when everything is stable again. This reduces planned downtime windows for important services.
It is also used for hardware maintenance and upgrades. Admins can move workloads to the secondary system, work on the primary, then resync and switch back when everything is stable again. This reduces planned downtime windows for important services.
Typical use cases for mirror backup
Mirror backup in broader backup strategies
In a complete backup strategy, mirroring is usually one layer among many. You might use a real-time mirror between two local storage systems and combine it with regular full or incremental backups to separate storage. This gives both fast failover and long-term data protection.
Some organizations mirror data between different sites or regions. This helps maintain availability during a site-level outage. However, they still keep scheduled backups in a separate, isolated environment. That isolation is what protects against widespread corruption or attack.
Some organizations mirror data between different sites or regions. This helps maintain availability during a site-level outage. However, they still keep scheduled backups in a separate, isolated environment. That isolation is what protects against widespread corruption or attack.
Best practices for using mirror backups
Never rely on a mirror as your only protection. Always pair mirroring with traditional backups that keep historical versions. Store those backups in locations that are not directly affected by live changes. This is essential for recovering from logical errors and cyberattacks.
Regularly test failover and failback processes. Make sure applications can switch to the mirror and back without data loss. Monitor replication status and alerts so you notice any lag or failures quickly. A broken mirror is worse than none if you discover it only during a crisis.
Document which systems use mirroring and why. Define clearly when to use the mirror for failover and when to restore from older backup sets instead. With this clarity, mirror backup becomes a powerful, controlled part of your data protection plan.
Regularly test failover and failback processes. Make sure applications can switch to the mirror and back without data loss. Monitor replication status and alerts so you notice any lag or failures quickly. A broken mirror is worse than none if you discover it only during a crisis.
Document which systems use mirroring and why. Define clearly when to use the mirror for failover and when to restore from older backup sets instead. With this clarity, mirror backup becomes a powerful, controlled part of your data protection plan.
Read the latest backup news:
January 19, 2010
Novosoft Signs Distribution Agreement with Nexway, Bringing the Leading Backup Solution to the Western Europe Region
December 22, 2009
Novosoft Provides 20% Discounts and Holidays Gifts on Handy Backup